This thread is about me rambling aloud, and based on almost 0 information on Bl2 and 1, wondering about the unfavorable comparison between Bl3 and its predecessor.
Feel free to pitch in and enlighten me!
I think we could agree the story of Borderland 3 is meh⦠Actually the DLC, while much shorter obviously, are somewhat more engaging⦠Mostly, I thinkk, because the underlying theme / story is more interesting, engaging and believable that the Calyspo twins story and ⦠Ava!
At any rate, I donāt mind it. Bl3 is my first Borderland, Inspired by the enemy psycho on the posters, I had low expectation for the story⦠and was pleasantly surprised by the fun game play.
Now, on youtube I stumbled on a lot of video where they say, allegedly, Borderland 1&2 was so much better⦠And, well, I fear this might be a sensitive topic that mostly attract deeply partisan response⦠But, without having played it, but just inspired by the general aesthetic of the game and fun fact like claptrap being an important characters in Bl2 I somewhat doubt that Bl2 had a deep and meaningful storyā¦
Perhaps though, it had a more engaging villain⦠The Heist DLC had interesting lore bit about Handsome Jack⦠Personally I quite liked Queen Tyreen, I was a subscriber of her! But I can see she was quite lowly rated by many other viewers⦠And Ava was another low point.
To summarise, maybe it all boils down to:
Bl3: has Ava (bad), has irritating excessively puerile youtuber: bad.
Bl2 has (allegedly magnetic) Handsome Jack: good.