well Ghalt is already very strong and his stun would just give guaranteed kills upon hooks.
Shayne having a aoe stun at level 2 and a stun at level 4 is very stupid.
nah it makes waaaaay more sense than the quick sand helix, there’s really no difference between the default slow and it, none tactical that I noticed. and no one in their right mind would pick it over the Attackspeed + default slow combo I mean that’s just common sense xd
The literal point of the Eldrid faction is to have no shields in exchange for passive shield regen. Buffing shield gear for the eldrid is nothing short of ridiculous.
Also, as much as you seem to hate it, every character needs to be taken into account when balancing gear. If this isn’t done, you get stuff like the infinite shield exploit or Orendis pillars doing 1k a pop.
How do I know that a stealth strike stun would be too powerful? Well I don’t know man…
Not every helix should be like that. Or can be. Not every character should have these, either. If you want to be able to change your basic attack styles whenever, maybe try playing games where you use different weapons instead of different characters.
The attacks and skills of characters are parts of their kit, I’d rather the characters had polished base kits instead of tons of different augments to make them less of the character they are.
Character design and balance is a lot more complicated than “Oh man wouldn’t this be cool. And this and this and this.”
No, I don’t know. Not even close to weak. Whiskey is in no way underpowered, he does not need any buffs.
Is this referring to my comment on the holotwin? You know it’d be much easier to respond if you used quotes.
Yes, it doesn’t do the damage it used to, that was the point of the nerfs. They wanted to nerf the damage so they did. Now it deals less damage. Imagine that!
Uh… ??? I really honestly can’t even tell if you’re being serious anymore.
Except a lot of people do take it as the increased slow is nice for your team to jump on.
Ah so you’ve never been hooked by a Ghalt before?
It’s really not the same thing.