Just because you disagree with someone doesn’t make them wrong.
Being wrong makes them wrong (which he was, and you are as well). You two have both completely ignored what I’ve been saying. Instead, you are inserting your own premise to craft a different basis for argument. That is what you are both wrong about. I actually agree with you on YOUR premise; new content should take priority over a new VH.
For the last time, in the most basic way I can explain it, my one and only argument is this:
If GB says no to ABC based on statistical data they have cherry-picked, then they should also apply the same reasoning to XYZ using the same data parameters, when both ABC and XYZ are closely related. Or in this specific case, interchangeable.
For example: GB says that they won’t eat cheese because they are lactose intolerant. They are telling you this as you watch them drink a glass of milk. The “lactose” in this analogy is equivalent to the statistical data I cited in my first post.
All that being said, I would much rather see meaningful content that is free with the purchase of the base game before seeing a new purchasable VH. But that’s not the argument I was making (although you seem to think it was). If you don’t get what I’m saying at this point, I give up lol. All I can say is that public discourse is not constructive if people are arguing against ideas that are not even being made in the first place. Hopefully most folks can agree on that at least.