Wording is important here my man (as I’ve learned myself)
Titles like yours, are often glanced over by the very people you want reading them.
I recommend practicing an age old supervisor tactic (build,break,build)
Start with positives (especially in the title, so anyone reading doesn’t immediately lump you in with the waa-waa crowd) then ease in the “constructive” criticism, then end it with a positive note.
Like so,
Title: New Meltdown is a fascinating alternative take! Yet, I have some ideas-
Body: bla-bla nice things. BUT, I feel the mode over all is so and so, and discourages so and so, and when I play it, I feel so and so. My suggestions for this are so and so.
Conclusion: This mode is so and so, but I still find so and so enjoyable and appreciate the effort.
A coupled peppered in words here and there go a long way.
Now onto the actual OP and my take.
I’m in agreement, that it could use some changes, here and there to really get it right. As it is now, matches tend to favor snowballing, and the leaders Elite wave is usually the only wave.
Some suggestions to give the underdogs a chance (just throwing stuff out there, I doubt any of this is actually good ^.^ ) is maybe only allow the underdogs build-ables during the leaders round? Perhaps allowing them to still buy their elite bots also. Something to allow them to alleviate some pressure, as they try to stay in the game.
I’ve yet to experience ‘sudden death’ but it sounds fun. Maybe one day (no one picks meltdown though)