It used to be that, if there were a tiebreaker situation, the game would look at overall score; how many kills, deaths, assists, etc, each team would have to determine who is the winner.
But “loss by first blood” is so mind-bogglingly stupid that it makes my brain hurt. Why can’t the scores of death, assists, kills, etc = who wins the game?
This system needs to be simplified and in such a way that it doesn’t nitpick at the match to determine a winner. What next, “loss by the person who got to the shock turret last”? It really is the most disappointing thing ever - and most time, the other team don’t deserve the victory!
If you’re in a match and your team has an overall score of 30 kills, 5 deaths, so-many assists, compared to the other team who are 10/25, shouldn’t WE win and not them? After all, we destroyed them in ways that are unimaginable and yet THEY get the overall victory? Get the hell outta here.