Maybe not complicated, but itās definitely long. Would like to see it.
I only wish i could queue the research.
1 Like
You can only queue research that is available to you at that moment. You canāt queue the ones that havenāt been unlocked since theyāre not visible. (which is good because that would be confusing have both available and unavailable research visible). Thatās why the tree is the best, you could see instantly which research you need, which ones you donāt have. It would probably have to take you to another screen cos itās so big.
But you could have separate trees for each category.
Dudeā¦ i know
Yeah, I was just making it clear to whoever is reading this, and to put the rest of my post on context.
I really wish the research tree was a tree, and not tabs.
This is especially needed to fix up HW1s research to require ions for destroyers.
Give me one page where each tech is a square with an icon. 
And the ones you canāt researched greyed out with their prereqs like needing a production facility listedā¦
Itās really really bad.
1 Like
Just give us back HW 1 research, that would be great.
1 Like
I agree, itās very messy.
I much preferred the ability to spread research across multiple research ships or have them work together as an when you wanted. In that respect I wish we had kept the old HW research method, just with a face lift to improve the UI aspect.
1 Like
Yes! Bring back parallel research queues. And the ability to assign multiple research ships to one job to speed things up!
Research tree diagram.
Tree-shaped research diagram that is a HUD overlay. Click on a particular leaf/branch of the tree and it will automatically research everything up to that point without needing to go back to the tech tree - until itās done - which it then says so, and maybe even gives a prompt to select a new technology ādestinationā so to speak.
Letās pretend Iām using a HW1 race and I want to research Destroyers. Can the system you propose foresee if I want to unlock the frigate path first (for support/assault/ion frigates) or the super-capital path first (for transports)? What if I want to research frigate drive first (support frigates), then frigate chassis (assault frigates), then super capital ship drive (transports, I need one moreā¦ for wathever purpose), then ion technology (ion frigates), then at last super capital chassis?
It may pick a standard route if you donāt care, or you can click-and-drag along the particular route you want to take. Or try and prioritize sections.
Example 1: I want to hit Super Capital Chasis as fast as possible. So I just click on that bubble in the research tree. It will pick the fastest route possible, regardless of how many things needs to be research. The emphasis is on TIME.
Example 2: I want to hit Super Capital Chasis as fast as possible, but I want a particular something along the way. There could be a simple feature to click-and-drag along the path you want.
Example 3: Those who donāt want the automization of research can just click on one at a time and wait for it to complete.
Example 4: Super Capital Chasis. Thatās priority. But I also need Gravity Wells! Simple left-click for Priority 1. Then select Gravity Well for Priority 2 with a right-click. It researches Priority 1 first. Once completed, it begins to work toward Priority 2. Both instances being capable of re-routing your research before you begin, or during ongoing progress.
This idea gives real credit to the phrase āTech Treeā in RTS games. It also allows you to SEE how much of the whole tree you have researched. It gives an idea of how far you have to go so people can gauge their status better rather than having to memorize the entire tech tree and know āhow farā something is away from where you are. AS things research, there could be a blue progress bar along the branches of the tree towards something so you can watch it go.
1 Like
Itās never just a tree, is it? Things have multiple prerequisities, so they branch out as much as converge.
And mods, they have even more prerequisities and research, so your ātreeā would have to be dynamic, or at the very least editable.
The resulting ātree diagramā is more of a net with overlapping threads all over it.
Donāt get me wrong, it would be nice. Just not as simple as you imagine.
I have a feeling it would look more like the London Underground map
1 Like
Tech trees not made with it in mind originally can be pretty tricky to cleanly lay out visually. The HW:@ tech trees are a decent example of that (UNH, Vay, FRN). A manual layout would likely be needed instead of automatic, which is a bit of an extra burden for modding/tweaking the game. But the functionality described is not uncommon for 4x games, so obviously itās fairly doable. Auto-research might be a bit tricky given the fact that research isnāt free here, but we already have pause buttons so not a big deal.
No offence, but your manual layout isnāt exactly the clearest informational thing either. 
I would go with automatic arrangement, but each time you would select something, the irrelevent unconnected things would gray out. So no matter what item on the techtree you would be looking at, you would see in color only the converging web of its prerequisities and a tree of the things it unlocks. I think that would be clear and neat.
[quote=āPouk, post:22, topic:216277ā]
No offence, but your manual layout isnāt exactly the clearest informational thing either.
[/quote] Thatās actually my point, as those layouts are actually automatic. I made a lot of small tweaks to try to ājiggleā the layout into something more readable, you should have seen the initial versions. But yes, that sort of visual filtering would help a lot.
Right, I didnāt think this version youāve shown was automatic. OK.
Still I imagine thereād be some diagonal lines? That would make it more readable.
I like this idea. If I want to rush to destroyers just let me select them and the game can then just research everything necessary for it. Let me pause, as usual, and weāre golden.
Or let me queue deeper upgrades if I research their prereqs.
1 Like