top-of-the-post-edit - yeesh, this got longer than I expected. I thought the forum software would shrink the quote block as well. My bad, hope folks read it through to the end.
I explained why “just Googling it” isn’t helpful enough. Do you know that Google weights search results according to your history (and a variety of other factors, notably including SEO, which doesn’t exactly have the greatest correlation with accuracy)? It’s not always helpful, especially for discussions like this one.
That said, it took several posts to convince you to post the graphs you did, so it is what it is. If you don’t want to provide citations or supporting evidence, I can’t force you.
Let’s talk about diversity as a concept. The push for diversity in the workplace is a reaction to the existing status quo that there isn’t a real representation of real-world population demographics in specific (popular examples include, but aren’t limited to, STEM companies). They don’t exist by themselves. It’s not some automatic advantage black folks have over white folks - it exists as a reaction to the fact that white people disproportionately fill job roles due to a variety of conscious and subconscious biases (in that STEM in particular is driven by wealth, and that tends to be concentrated in white dudes). It doesn’t just affect black people as a demographic, it tends to affect all non-white demographics because, for at least most of the Western world, white folks are seen as the “default” and have the innate advantages mentioned above.
Affirmative action has a legal background, and operates in a different way. This is a pretty good comparison. Note the mention of “qualified” in the descriptor. It’s not just “hire someone because of their skin”, or “promote someone because of their gender”. This would not be affirmative action. It would be performative, at best. Which means your problem here isn’t actually with affirmative action. It’s with companies filling up a quota without actually working to undo the discrimation that leads to job role inequality in the first place.
You can believe or disbelieve whatever you want - that’s your belief. In my experience, a strongly-held belief is difficult to change. But that doesn’t make it any more than an opinion. I don’t really want to touch the rest of your paragraphs relating to that because I find the assumptions they make distasteful (to say the least).
I want to conclude by talking about welfare. You’ve provided no sources for this claim about black people benefitting “way more” from welfare, but I’ll do my best.
This is an old read, but one that highlights that most minorities (if not all) benefit from welfare in similar ways, and that black demographics are not the exception.
Here’s a more recent read about the stereotype of assuming black people have a greater reliance on / benefit from more welfare compared other demographics. It links to the full piece at the end of the (short) page.
So no, I can’t agree with your claim that black people in the US benefit disproportionately from welfare.